Graduating in 2025 webinar - SIGN UP Loading...

Secure a place for the Graduating in 2025 webinar

📅 June 18, 2025 • 12:00 pm • Malaysia (GMT +8) • Online
9.30 a.m. Mumbai, 11 a.m. Ho Chi Minh, 2 p.m. Sydney
Limited Registration Closes In:
0 Days 00 Hours 00 Mins 00 Secs
A 2025 CV starter pack, exclusive to international students
Practical guide to scoring interviews
Discover scholarships for master's programmes worth up to US$25,000

    Only 21 spots Available.

    US: University student loses free speech appeal over anti-lesbian essay

    US: University student loses free speech appeal over anti-lesbian essay
    Pompeo had written the movie had "championed the barren wombs of these women". Source: VinnieMacMedia/Vimeo

    A former University of New Mexico student failed to persuade a federal appeals court the school violated her free speech rights by rejecting an essay containing anti-lesbian remarks she had written for a film class.

    The 10th United States Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday said the university had legitimate pedagogical concerns when its professors refused to grade Monica Pompeo’s critique of a film about a lesbian romance. They had suggested she rewrite it, prompting her withdrawal from the class in the spring of 2012.

    Pompeo had written the 1985 film Desert Hearts could be viewed as “entirely perverse in its desire and attempt to reverse the natural roles of man and woman in addition to championing the barren wombs of these women.”

    Writing for a two-judge panel, Circuit Judge Carlos Lucero said Pompeo did not have an unfettered right to use language in a course assignment professors might find offensive.

    He said this meant the university and two professors who reviewed Pompeo’s essay were not liable for damages for any alleged First Amendment violations.

    “Teaching students to avoid inflammatory language when writing for an academic audience qualifies as a legitimate pedagogical goal,” Lucero wrote.

    “Short of turning every classroom into a courtroom, we must entrust to educators these decisions that require judgments based on viewpoint.”

    Pompeo’s lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    https://twitter.com/SlearysCircus/status/681129382300155904

    University spokesman Dianne Anderson said in an email on behalf of the professors the school was pleased the decision “provides a more complete perspective on the facts” and affirmed the lack of evidence of a free speech violation.

    The university refunded Pompeo’s tuition for the class, court records show.

    Tuesday’s decision by the Denver-based appeals court let stand a September 2015 ruling by Chief Judge M. Christina Armijo of the federal court in Albuquerque.

    Circuit Judge Neil Gorsuch, the US Supreme Court nominee of President Donald Trump, was originally part of the 10th Circuit panel, but did not participate in Tuesday’s decision.

    The case is Pompeo v. Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico et al, 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 15-2179.

    Liked this? Then you’ll love these…

    Charges on Malaysian students for dissent show region-wide cancer on free speech

    Student activist case shows China’s ‘slow progress’ on LGBT rights – HRW